Thursday, June 20, 2013

Mods Versus Rockers: Brighton, 1964

Battle of the Mods & Rockers. Hastings 1964.
Battle of the Mods & Rockers. Hastings 1964. (Photo credit: Phil Sellens)
by Andy J Wilson

The Mods, with their sharp Italian suits and parkas, contrasted totally with the leather-coated and long-haired rockers.

The mods regarded the rockers as old-fashioned, grubby and oafish, while the rockers regarded the mods as being effeminate, snobbish and weedy.

There is a clear contrast between the metropolitan and the rural shades of Britain which the mod/rocker dichotomy illustrates.

The musical tastes differed markedly too. Mods favored Jazz, Reggae and Soul while the rockers revered the giants of the rock n' roll era such as Elvis Presley and Eddie Cochran.

Throughout the early 1960s, mods and rockers would engage in brawls in many of Britain's seaside towns, particularly along the South coast. Towns such as Margate, Bournemouth, Brighton and Clacton were the scene of much gang-warfare at this time.

In 1964, news-stories appeared which gave the impression of a full-scale war between the two tribes. The media's role in the conflict was central from the outset.

Consequently the mod/rocker war became a subject of interest for the sociologists, psychologists and other society-pundits.

Some saw the conflict as typical male-youth behavior while others regarded it as a new phenomenon; this being relevant when we consider that the growth of technology and the economy had now made possible mass-ownership of scooters and bikes.

The mod scene had been noted for its sophistication and fashion-savvy; it now found itself somewhat unfairly recast as the tribe for deviants and hooligans.

Battles between the two often occurred where territories overlapped, or where rival factions happened on one another. As noted, there was an urban-rural split, meaning that the groups could only fight if brought together by some co-incidence.

Most often, such a scenario would involve an encounter at one of the seaside towns; the getaway destination of choice for British youth in an era before mass air-travel.

In these battles, mods would often be armed with fish-hooks and razors which they had sewn into their jacket-lapels to shred the fingers of an assailant. This was a common tactic of the Teddy Boy gangs of the late 1950s.

Weapons were used by both sides of course, including flick-knives, coshes and bike-chains. The various brawls and conflicts escalated throughout the early 1960s, culminating in Clacton in 1964 during the Easter weekend.

The second round of the violence that began in Clacton occurred a month later during the Whitsun weekend break, when large numbers of rocker and mod gangs descended on Margate, Brighton and Broadstairs, each side unaware they had decided on the same rallying destination.

The rival gangs were openly fighting, often tearing up deckchairs or whatever breakable objects came to hand. Brighton saw the worst of the violence, which raged for two days before moving on to Hastings.

It then spilled back into Brighton where one group of rockers had become trapped on the beach there. Despite attempts by the police to protect them, they were assaulted by gangs of mods.

The newspapers lapped it up, describing the battles as being of "disastrous proportions". The mods and rockers were labeled as "sawdust caesars" and "louts".

Many newspaper editorials fanned the flames of hysteria, with the Birmingham Post in 1964 warning that the mods and rockers were "internal enemies" in the UK. If unchallenged, it went on, they (the mods and rockers) would "bring about the disintegration of a nation's character".

The magazine Police Review argued that the mods and rockers purported lack of respect for law and order would cause violence to "surge and flame like a forest fire".

Some sociologists argued that as media-hysteria about knife-wielding violent mods increased, the image of the fur-collared parka and scooter was bound to provoke punitive reactions among the public.

As a result of the media-coverage, two British MPs visited the seaside areas to survey the damage. This lead to MP Harold Gurden calling for a resolution of intensified measures to control hooliganism.

Prosecutors in the trial of some of those arrested during the fighting in Clacton had argued that neither faction had "serious views" and lacked respect for law and order.

However, there was some suspicion that the media had in some cases used false photographs, interviews and fictional characters to get mileage from the events, many proving unrelated to the mod/rocker issue.

When the media had exhausted real news items, they would publish deceptive headlines with loaded sub-headers such as 'Violence'; often above a report which contained no description of violence at all.

This constant branding by free-association to all things violent and criminal, saw the mods and rockers linked with any critical social issue of the day, such as teen-age pregnancy, drug-abuse and violence.

In this light, the events of Brighton in 1964 can be seen as being a huge media-hype of a situation that had not been planned for, in marked contrast to what was implied by the stream of press-reports at the time.

Its effect was to tarnish the mod image of sophisticated cool with an altogether more sinister aspect; totally distracting from the enormously significant impact that the mod-scene had on British pop and fashion culture; enriching it and paving the way for a more diverse and multicultural society.

The author operates an online clothing shop that specialises in mod t shirts. We stock a large selection of designs including scooter and mod target roundel t shirts.

Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/?expert=Andy_J_Wilson
http://EzineArticles.com/?Mods-Versus-Rockers:-Brighton,-1964&id=7725967

Enhanced by Zemanta

Monday, June 10, 2013

Neil Young's "After The Gold Rush": The Review From Hell

Cover of "After the Gold Rush"
Cover of After the Gold Rush
by Garrett Sawyer

I want you to imagine for one moment that you've just released an album.

It's a solo album for which you used a backing band.

It's not your first album. It's your third solo album and the seventh album total if you include other bands you've recorded with in the last few years.

Now imagine that your bright, shiny new album just got reviewed. And the reviewer said the following:

*That your fans will be kidding themselves if they try to convince themselves that your new album is good.
*That most of the songs were not ready to be recorded when you took them to the studio.
*That your backing band never really got behind the songs.
*That you had trouble singing many of them.
*That the best song on your nice, new album is one of the best songs you ever wrote but your backing band played sloppy, that the instruments never really come together.
*That you sound like pre-adolescent whining.
*That you're singing a half octave above your highest acceptable vocal range and that because of it...
*The reviewer can't listen to your vocals at all.

OK, show of hands. How many of you, upon reading such a review of your labor of love, would be either reaching for some Prozac or calling up your therapist in a panic? Thought so.

Well, guess what? This actually happened to Neil Young. The above comments are straight from the review of "After The Gold Rush" written by Langdon Winner for no less than Rolling Stone (it appeared in the October 15, 1970 issue).

If it will make any of you Neil Young fans feel any better Winner wrote a very uncomplimentary review of the album Young played on just before "After The Gold Rush": the 1970 Crosby, Stills, Nash and Young classic "Deja Vu".

In his review of Neil Young's third solo album he concluded his uncomplimentary observations by observing that "After The Gold Rush" continued where "Deja Vu" left off.

And that "best song" Winner was referring to? That would be "Southern Man", the anti-black racism standard-bearer of the rock era.

Not only that but this album yielded Neil Young's first solo chart hit, "Only love can break your heart", written for sometime band-mate Graham Nash as a result of the latter's breakup with Joni Mitchell. It reached #33 on Billboard's charts by the December after release.

Happily, it will amuse you to know that Rolling Stone changed its mind ... and not just slightly, either. By 1975 a review of Young's then newest album "Tonight's the Night" referred to "After The Gold Rush", in retrospect, as a "masterpiece".

And they would go on to rank it as #74 on its list of the 500 greatest albums of all time (they changed their mind about "Deja Vu" as well, ranking it #147 on the same list).

To all of you out there who are struggling in whatever endeavor you are involved in remember Neil Young's "After The Gold Rush" whenever you get criticized or castigated. And remember where it ended up.

If you like Neil Young's "After the Gold Rush" then you'll like a song inspired by the story of a young soldier who returned from Iraq. For a limited time only you can download that song for FREE by clicking HERE.

Download your free mp3 at: http://www.garrettsawyer.net/am/

Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/?expert=Garrett_Sawyer
http://EzineArticles.com/?Neil-Youngs-After-The-Gold-Rush:-The-Review-From-Hell&id=7754675

Enhanced by Zemanta